wetten en regels in ai in customer contact
AI

AI Rules and Regulations in the Netherlands

Legal analysis AI customer‑contact agent (NL/EU)

EU legislation: AI Act, GDPR and ePrivacy

AI Act (EU AI Regulation 2024/1689): The EU AI Act introduces a risk‑based framework for AI systems. An AI customer‑contact agent will likely fall into the limited‑risk category, mainly because it is a chatbot that communicates with humans autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl. From August 2026 transparency requirements will apply: users must be clearly informed that they are interacting with an AI (and not a human) autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl accountant.nl. This prevents deception and builds trust. For higher‑risk AI systems (such as AI in education, finance, etc.) stricter obligations apply, including risk management, high data quality, logging, technical documentation, transparency and human oversight digital‑strategy.ec.europa.eu. If the AI agent were ever classified as “high risk” (which is unlikely here), formal CE‑marking would be required after a conformity assessment. In our case the agent presumably remains limited risk: prohibited AI applications do not apply and high‑risk use‑cases (such as biometrics, judiciary, etc.) are not at issue autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl. However, [client] must comply with the general AI Act duties such as transparency (AI identification) and best practices for reliability.

GDPR / AVG (General Data Protection Regulation): The AI agent processes personal data (such as account data, chat questions). Therefore full compliance with the GDPR is mandatory autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl. Key requirements:

  • Legal basis & consent: Every processing activity must have a valid legal basis (e.g. necessary for performance of the service or legitimate interest) autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl. For ordinary support questions the processing purpose “customer service” will generally fall under performance of the contract with the user. Explicit consent may be required if the agent processes special categories of personal data (e.g. health information in legacy wishes) or if chat data are used for secondary purposes. Without a valid basis no personal data may be processed. In case of doubt (e.g. using chat logs to train AI) it is safer to request consent or conduct a legitimate‑interest test with safeguards legalz.nl legalz.nl.

  • Transparency & information duty: [client] must clearly inform users about the deployment of the AI agent and what happens with it. Both in the privacy notice and during the chat users must see they are chatting with an AI and how conversations are recorded/processed accountant.nl. Under GDPR Articles 12‑14 data subjects have the right to understandable information about the processing autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl. The underlying logic and consequences of automated processing must be explained on request. The user must know answers are generated by algorithms—not human intuition—and where to go with complaints.

  • Privacy by design & by default: Privacy must be built in from the outset autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl. Only strictly necessary data may be processed (data minimisation). Default settings must be privacy‑friendly (e.g. chat logs not kept longer than needed).

  • Security (Art. 32 GDPR): Adequate technical and organisational measures must protect personal data autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl. Use encrypted connections, secure log storage, role‑based access. Given access to sensitive legacy data, ISO 27001 certification is advisable. ePrivacy requires confidentiality of electronic communications.

  • Storage limitation: Personal data (like chat transcripts) must not be kept longer than necessary. Establish clear retention periods; anonymise or delete logs once no longer needed.

  • Data‑subject rights: Users must be able to exercise their GDPR rights (access, rectification, erasure, objection, portability). The bot must not make legally significant automated decisions without human review.

ePrivacy (Telecommunications Act): Chat and email are confidential; third‑party AI providers need processor agreements and may not repurpose data. Marketing messages require opt‑in. Non‑essential cookies in the chat need consent.

Consumer protection (EU & NL)

  • Information & transparency: All price and contract info must be correct and complete; misleading statements are forbidden ondernemersplein.overheid.nl.

  • Recognisability as AI: Consumers must not be misled about whether they speak with a bot or a human.

  • No manipulation: AI may not exploit emotions or use unfair persuasion; the ACM warns human‑like bots can deceive.

  • Liability & complaints: The company remains liable for the bot’s answers (see Air Canada ruling). Provide an easy complaint path.

  • Service rights: SaaS users need easy cancellation, data export, cooling‑off right information, etc.

Sector‑specific

The platform may store sensitive data (will wishes, medical instructions). Special‑category data require explicit consent and extra safeguards (encryption, MFA). No extra licences apply so long as [client] only registers data and gives no legal/medical advice.

Specific requirements for the AI agent

  • Transparency: Bot must identify itself as AI and disclose limitations.
  • Accuracy & consistency: Answers must align with official info; outdated or false answers risk liability.
  • Human‑in‑the‑loop: Provide escalation to a live agent automatically (fallback) or on request; document criteria.
  • Logging & monitoring: Securely log chats and internal decision data for accountability and improvement.
  • Consent & opt‑outs: Ask before processing extra personal data; offer option to bypass AI.
  • Restrictions on automated actions: AI must not execute impactful actions (delete account, charge card) without human approval.
  • Quality & bias testing: Ensure no discrimination or toxic output; high‑quality datasets.
  • Explainability: Be able to explain how an answer was produced.
  • Robustness & uptime: Fail‑safes, accurate domain answers, graceful degradation.
  • Decision‑process logging: Log intents, sources, confidence for governance.

Certifications and standards

  • ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management System; demonstrates GDPR Art. 32 compliance.
  • ISO/IEC 27701: Privacy Information Management; maps to GDPR obligations.
  • ISO/IEC 23894:2023: AI Risk Management; aligns with AI Act risk‑management.
  • ISO/IEC 42001:2023: AI Management System; full AI governance framework.
  • NEN 7510 / NTA 7516: Dutch healthcare‑security standards if health data involved.
  • CE‑marking: Required only if agent becomes high‑risk AI in future.
  • ISO 9001 / ISO 22301: Optional for quality and business continuity assurance.

Organisational and technical measures

  • DPIA before launch; review after major changes; consult DPA if residual high risk.
  • AI policy & governance: Defined scope, system owner, change management, technical dossier.
  • Staff training & awareness: Guidelines on data entry, privacy, escalation.
  • Limit external data transfer: Prefer EU hosting; sign processor agreements; minimise data sent to vendors.
  • Security controls: TLS, strong auth, role‑based access, IDS, pentests, backups, fail‑safes.
  • Privacy safeguards: Anonymise old chats; support deletion; respect Do‑Not‑Track.
  • Incident response: Breach notification ≤ 72 h; monitor AI for anomalies.
  • Continuous quality monitoring: Track resolution rates, user feedback; fix mis‑answer patterns.
  • Documentation: GDPR Art. 30 register; SOPs; processing logs.
  • Audits & ethical reviews: Internal/external audits; ethics board scenarios.
  • Regulator engagement: Follow DPA & ACM guidance; consider joining EU AI Pact.

Implementing all these measures creates a responsible AI‑customer‑contact environment: users receive safe, accurate answers; privacy is respected; and [client] meets Dutch and EU law—boosting legal certainty and user trust.

Sources and documentation

(Sources consulted: Dutch Data Protection Authority, Dutch government/RVO, European Commission, reputable news outlets.)

Tags
GDPR
Rules
Laws